CrossCurrents A Catholic Reflects on Faith in Our Times
Bernard
F. Swain, Ph.D.
USA: A “Christian Nation?”
The
Republican Party of Texas has approved a plank in its platform stating, “The
United States of America is a Christian Nation.” Media pundits from Fox TV’s
Bill O’Reilly to Reason Magazine’s Cathy Young to the Rev. Jerry Falwell have
weighed in on the subsequent controversy.
No one seems to
know quite what the phrase means. Is it an attack on “the myth” of church/state
separation? Is it an affirmation of Christianity as the core of the American
spirit? Is it anti-Semitism? Is it merely a “largely symbolic” response to
secular activists and judges? Is it only a statement of numerical fact?
One thing, however,
appears obvious: the phrase “Christian Nation” is the sharpest single way of
expressing what America's “culture wars” are all about.
Since the 1963
Supreme Court decision banning public school prayer, growing numbers of
Americans have come to fear that “Christian values” are losing ground in the
public sector. The symptoms of such a “Christian retreat” are numerous:
widespread divorce; premarital sex; legalization of abortion; “permissive”
attitudes in our schools, communities, and media; removal of Christian displays
from public places; growing acceptance of gays.
In reaction,
organizations like the Christina Coalition and the Moral Majority have waged
electoral battle against “secular humanism” by asserting “traditional Christian
values.” This movement helped Ronald Reagan become President in 1980, promoted
a Republican majority in Congress over the last 20 years, prompted George W.
Bush to offer his “faith based initiatives” in 2001, and is currently planning
to push “culture issues” to the center of the 2004 electoral campaign. If these
alarmed Christians have their way, we’ll be hearing a lot about “Christian
values” in this Fall’s presidential debates.
For such people,
the phrase ”Christian nation” sums up the high stakes they are fighting for.
They are convinced that the USA’s greatness depends on its foundation as a
Christian nation, and that its future is imperiled by the threat of losing its
Christian identity. They believe the USA has always been a “Christian
Nation”—and they crusade to ensure that it always will be.
For the moment,
I’ll pass on the question of how well such Christians understand what
Christianity is actually all about, and concentrate another question: how well
do they understand their own nation?
In my opinion,
American history has arrived at a major fork in the road of its destiny. To
move in the right direction, we need to be clearer, wiser, and more realistic
about our past, our present, and out future.
Our Christian
Past. I
think there is ample evidence, and a general public consensus, for
acknowledging the USA’s Christian heritage. My part of the country, New
England, was founded as a puritan theocracy—a church-state. Pennsylvania has
its Quaker roots, Maryland its Catholic roots. French missionaries opened the
Midwest frontier and French merchants settled the mid-south. Spanish
missionaries brought Europeans to Florida and California, Texas belonged to
Catholic Mexico before its own independence, In short, our nation was formed as
the native tribes, each with their own local cultures and religions, were
overrun and dominated by white peoples who brought distinct versions of the
same European culture and Christian religion. It is impossible to understand
American history if one ignores its Christian character.
Our Christian
Present.
The USA today remains the most “Christian” culture among advanced industrial
societies, even compared to countries like England which recognize a state
church. Most Americans tell pollsters they believe in God, pray, even go to
Church. We continue to observe Christian holy days like Christmas and Good
Friday and Thanksgiving. Foreign visitors are often stunned to see the number
and variety of Christian churches in our towns and cities.
But the Founding
Fathers planted a time bomb on December 15, 1791 by adding the First amendment
to the US Constitution. In declaring “Congress shall make no law respecting
an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,”
they were acting to guarantee all religions freedom by denying any religion a
privileged position as the nation’s officially “established” religion. At the
time, they had competing Protestant denominations in mind, but legally they
were committing the nation to refusing privilege to any religion,
including Christianity as a whole.
Today, of
course, most Americans are still Christians. But our immigrant society has
evolved beyond the WASP demographics of our colonial era. Huge waves of
Catholics in transformed many parts of America; Boston, once the capital of
puritan America, has become The USA's first major metropolitan area with a
Catholic majority. Nearly half the Jews living outside Israel live in America.
Recent immigrations have brought Vietnamese and Cambodian Buddhists, Indian and
Pakistani Hindus, and many Middle Eastern and African Muslims to our shores.
The same First
Amendment that once protected Protestants from dominating one another now
guarantees all these newcomers that Christianity will not dominate them. We can
acknowledge that, as a society, America maintains a strong, even dominant
Christian presence, but that is simple a fact of our history, not an official
public value or principle. And while the constitutional principle that
prohibits any religion from seeking a privileged position is permanent, the
facts of history keep changing.
Our Future? The fork in the road we are
approaching gives us three choices: 1. Do we struggle to maintain a
“Christian America”? 2. Do we concede our nation to a secular model? 3. Do we
embrace a multi-religious future?
1. Maintaining a
“Christian America” is, in my opinion, a futile option. The Constitutional
time-bomb makes it inevitable that, as our society becomes more religiously
diverse, legal challenges to public support for Christian institutions will
grow. The First Amendment’s past effect was to keep each Protestant
denomination just one among many other equally protected Christian churches;
the Amendment’s future effect will be to make Christianity one religion among
many other equally protected religions. The history of America’s Christian
roots can never be unwritten, but the era of Christian dominance is over
forever.
2. Many
crusaders for a “Christian Nation” fear a secular takeover of our culture.
Meanwhile the rest of us are beginning to realize that the real threat is not
the disappearance of religion but the rise of religious fanaticism and
extremism. Isn’t that the most obvious lesson of 9/11? In my view, it is time
we recognize that our biggest enemies are not secular humanists but people who
are bent on dictating our conformity to a fraudulent, invented version of
whatever religion they claim to represent.
The old saying
“any enemy of my enemy is my friend" applies here. Just because America
becomes less Christian doesn't mean it will become more secular, and humanists
are just as opposed to religious extremism as most Christians are. Why not
treat them as allies fighting together to ensure a future where the values we
share –like freedom—are honored?
3. The “new
religions” of America—Buddhism, Islam Hinduism, etc—are also natural allies for
the future. We better realize a basic truth before it is too late: resisting
the influx of legitimate religions only encourages people to resort to more
extremist versions. This means that insisting on Christianity’s privileged
status is the surest way to promote extremism. The surest way to prevent
Muslim extremism here is to embrace real mainstream Islam. Recent history makes
it abundantly clear, to the surprise of many, that the world’s future is
neither Christian nor secular, but multi-religious. As André Malraux once said,
“The 21st century will either be religious, or it will not be.”
It is folly for us to either to ignore this future or to deliver it into the
hands of extremists.
The fork in our
destiny’s road is just ahead. We must all learn to cherish America’s Christian
roots while embracing its inter-faith future—it is the only future that has
a future.
©
Bernard F. Swain PhD 2004
Send Your Comments and
Questions to bfswain@juno.com
Dr. Swain’s opinions do not represent the views of this parish or any
other official body.
Bernie Swain has devoted more than 30 years to adult spiritual
formation in dioceses in the US, Canada, and France. Since 1991 he has
maintained a private practice as trainer, teacher, and consultant to leaders in
parishes and other religious organizations. He holds degrees in theology and
political science from Holy Cross, Harvard, The University of Paris, and the
University of Chicago. His writings include Liberating Leadership (Harper
& Row, 1986) and more than 200 articles in periodicals such as The
National Catholic Reporter, Commonweal, The Miami Herald, The Catholic Free
Press, The Pilot, Harvard Theological Review, and Liturgy.
A lifelong layperson, he lives in Boston with his wife and three children
CrossCurrents Is a weekly subscription service available for parish websites;
for Information, contact bfswain@juno.com
or call 617-282-0183